Lisa Su Called the Market ‘Short-Sighted’ as AMD Crashed 17%. Two Sessions Later the Stock Has It All Back

Tech Business

AMD Reverses 17% Crash and Adds Nearly $100 Billion

AMD erased a 17.26% crash in two sessions, adding nearly $100 billion in value. An EPYC role in Google Cloud TPU 8tx systems and a $600 analyst target offset Nvidia’s decline.

By
Grace Kim
Filed
Channel
Tech Business
Read
5 min read

AMD recovered a 17.26% crash and added nearly $100 billion in market value, closing at $508.58 on Monday after a 13% session gain. Two sessions after Thursday’s close at $404.40, the stock stood 25.8% higher and above its pre-crash close of $488.78.

AMD chair and CEO Lisa Su said on Yahoo Finance after Thursday’s fall: “I think the market can sometimes be a little bit short-sighted. It is what it is.” For one session, the market appeared to side with Su.

Three developments converged Monday. Oppenheimer analyst Rick Schafer upgraded AMD to Outperform from Perform in a Sunday note, setting a $600 target 34% above Friday’s close. AMD said EPYC processors would run the host side of Google Cloud’s new TPU 8tx systems.

Nvidia fell as much as 8.8% and closed down 4.3%, erasing about $192 billion of value a day after its board opened an independent investigation into reports about chief executive Jensen Huang.

How strong is AMD’s operating case?

AMD reported third-quarter revenue of $13.4 billion on Nov. 3, up 45%. Data-center revenue reached $8.5 billion, up 97%. The company guided fourth-quarter revenue to about $17 billion, plus or minus 3%.

Su said on the earnings call that she expected 2027 revenue growth above 80%. Oppenheimer modeled data-center revenue growth of 135% next year. The first set of figures covers reported results and company guidance; the latter two remain forecasts.

What changed for the retirement account?

A case study follows a 67-year-old retired engineer who bought 1,000 AMD shares on Oct. 14, 2022, at $55.94, the year’s lowest close. The $55,940 purchase sat in a taxable brokerage account.

He and his 64-year-old wife held $1.9 million in other savings: a $1.5 million rollover IRA, a $200,000 Roth and $200,000 in an index fund and cash. They collect $60,000 a year in Social Security and draw $60,000 from the IRA.

At Friday’s close, the shares were worth $449,040; Monday’s close raised that to $508,580. The one-session gain was $59,540 and the two-session gain was $104,180. The unrealized gain reached $452,640, and the position equaled 9.1 times its cost.

At the Oct. 6 record close of $649.42, the position was worth $649,420, leaving it $140,840 below that peak. At the prior year-end close of $214.16, it represented 10% of the couple’s money. At Monday’s price, it represented 21% of a $2,408,580 portfolio.

He did nothing, and one stock doubled its retirement weight.

How much remains at the $600 target?

By Monday’s close, AMD had covered 39% of the distance from Friday’s close to the $600 target, leaving 18% upside. At $600, 1,000 shares would be worth $600,000, another $91,420.

A repeat of Thursday’s 17.26% fall would cost $87,798 in one day. The two dollar exposures were nearly equal, and such a fall had occurred twice this year.

What does AMD’s trading history show?

  • Since 2000, AMD has closed down at least 15% in one session 19 times, including Thursday. Two occurred this year.
  • On Feb. 4, AMD fell 17.3% on its outlook, then rose 110% over the next three months.
  • Across the 18 earlier drops, AMD traded higher six months later in 12 cases, with a median gain of 23%. At three months, it was higher in nine of 18 cases, with a median gain of 7%.
  • Four drops in 2000-2002 before the dot-com low, the September 2008 drop and the July 2014 drop each left AMD 29% to 39% lower after six months.
  • Monday’s two-session gain of 25.8% had occurred 15 times since 2000 before Monday, most recently on Oct. 7, 2025.

The record suggests frequent recoveries, but it does not identify which kind of catalyst Thursday was.

What would a sale cost?

Selling all 1,000 shares at $508.58 realizes a long-term gain of $452,640. With the $60,000 IRA withdrawal and 85% of Social Security taxable, the calculation produces 2026 adjusted gross income of $563,640.

The calculation assigns $21,750 of the gain to the 0% capital-gains bracket and $430,890 to 15%, producing $64,634 in tax. The 3.8% net investment income tax adds $11,918, bringing federal tax to $77,980, or 17.2% of the gain. The sale leaves $430,600 after tax.

Two years later, Medicare would charge each spouse $649.20 a month for Part B instead of $202.90, a $10,711 annual surcharge.

  • Selling 530 shares returns AMD to 10% of the portfolio and realizes $239,899. Federal tax reaches $37,985, including $3,834 of net investment income tax. The Part B surcharge two years later reaches $7,790 for the couple. The article presents this as the trim most advisers would start with.
  • Selling 265 shares this year and 265 the next January realizes $119,950 in each year. Each sale costs $15,849 in federal tax and no net investment income tax because income stays below $250,000.
  • Across the two years, tax reaches $31,699, $6,286 less than the 530-share sale. The Part B surcharge is $1,949 a year because $230,950 of income crosses only the first $218,000 line.

Why can the plan still fail?

These estimates remain sensitive. The figures use 2026 rules for both years, while 2027 brackets will be wider. Medicare’s two-year lookback means a 2026 sale sets the 2028 premium, and thresholds will have moved. State taxes are excluded.

AMD shares also lost more than half their value in the year after four of the 19 large drops. A holder who sold at $404 on Thursday would have missed $104,180 on 1,000 shares by Monday.

The case study’s preferred plan sells 265 shares now and 265 in January. It restores AMD to 10%, keeps net investment income tax at zero, limits the Medicare surcharge to $1,949 a year and leaves 470 shares to track the $600 target.

For AMD, the next test is whether it can convert the Google Cloud deployment and projected data-center growth into earnings while Nvidia faces its own governance and market pressure.

Source: 247wallst.com

Share this article:

More from Grace Kim

Grace Kim

Show full bio

Market editor covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in Semiconductors, chip manufacturing, hardware, AI compute at Chip Dispatch.

799 articles

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »