Elegoo M1 Ultra review: A good first entry into the scanner market

Consumer Tech

Elegoo M1 Ultra scanner review: Strong features, heavy caveats

The $1,599 Elegoo M1 Ultra offers five scan modes, a touchscreen and long battery life, but it needs a powerful PC or Mac and repeated scans for best results.

By
Tom Whitfield
Filed
Channel
Consumer Tech
Read
6 min read

By Tom Whitfield

The Elegoo M1 Ultra offers five scanning modes, a 3-inch color touchscreen and a current $1,599 price, but it cannot process scans without a fairly high-end PC or Mac. That computer dependency, rather than the sensor package, defines Elegoo’s first entry into the 3D scanner market.

Reviewer Denise Bertacchi said the scanner’s output “rivals any of the scanners” she had tested, though extra work was needed. Four blue-laser configurations and near-infrared (NIR) binocular structured light form the sensor package. A spare battery and optional Wi-Fi add utility, but the turntable for small objects is absent.

What does the hardware feel like?

The M1 Ultra weighs 511 g (1.12 pounds) with its battery installed. A rubber grip and balanced body aid handling, although large hands may cover the screen.

The small screen sets parameters, starts and stops captures and shows progress. Its interface is well laid out. When a scan starts on the scanner, its settings take precedence over those on the tethered computer.

The box contains a padded hard case, glass calibration board, spare rechargeable battery, NIR filters, USB-C cable, lens cloth and marker dots. It omits a turntable, so testing used one borrowed from a Creality Pika.

Blue, white and infrared LEDs, blue lasers and cameras fill the scanning end. NIR filters aid outdoor or harsh-light use. Batteries charge through USB-C when detached; the installed battery can also charge from the computer in USB mode.

In wireless testing, Bertacchi reached about five feet from the subject in a harsh radio-frequency environment without testing farther. The wired USB-C link delivered the fastest connectivity, so she considered tethered scanning worth the hassle. The review also calls the Wi-Fi connection stable.

Bertacchi said, “The battery life is excellent,” and noted that almost all testing used one charge plus the spare. The package therefore offers portable hardware with good endurance, but it still relies on an external computer.

What can the scanner measure?

  • Blue laser: Single, seven-line or 34-line configurations. The table lists accuracy up to 0.02 mm, 3D resolution of 0.05–2 mm, working distance of 200–600 mm and speed at or below 100 fps.
  • NIR binocular structured light: Accuracy up to 0.05 mm/m, resolution of 0.1–2 mm, working distance of 170–1,200 mm and speed at or below 30 fps.

The published table gives minimum scan volume as 5 × 5 × 5 mm for blue laser and 170–1,200 mm for NIR. Its blue-laser alignment field reads 170–1,200 mm; NIR alignment says geometry/texture. It calls blue-laser speed “standalone,” despite the need for external processing.

Elegoo specifies OBJ, STL, PLY and ASC output, color texture, Windows or Mac operation, wired USB and optional Wi-Fi. The table lists an October 29, 2026 release date and $1,699 price, versus the $1,599 current price in the review.

The numbers place the scanner among precise tools, while the standalone label and price discrepancy need clarification.

What does setup demand?

Calibration uses the glass board to set the scanner at different angles and heights. On-screen guidance shows a target and a live scanner image, which the user must match before moving on. Bertacchi found the process simple despite calibration being a common scanner chore.

Elegoo Scan downloads from Elegoo’s website for Windows and Mac. Its interface and behavior resemble CrealityScan, which also handles individual-scan cleanup and stitching. An older PC that met the minimum requirements except for 8 GB of RAM could not run the software adequately.

  • Recommended PC: Windows 10/11 64-bit, Intel Core i7 13th Gen or higher, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 or higher with 8 GB VRAM, and 32 GB or more RAM.
  • Recommended Mac: macOS 14 or later, Apple M4 or later, and 32 GB or more RAM.
  • Minimum PC: 16 GB RAM, Windows 10/11 64-bit, Intel Core i7 7th Gen and NVIDIA GPU with 6 GB VRAM.
  • Minimum Mac: macOS 14 or later, Apple M2 CPU and 16 GB RAM.

The software is approachable, but its recommended memory and GPU levels make the computer a material part of the purchase.

How well does it capture objects?

The four blue-laser modes trade speed for detail. Thirty-four crossed laser lines support quick scans, seven parallel lines capture finer detail, one line reaches deeper holes, and markerless mode omits markers. Fewer lines require more time.

An 895 brushed drill motor required several scans, and the scanner struggled with shiny surfaces. Two captures held enough usable data. Automatic alignment worked in most cases but could not resolve the motor geometry; manual marker-based alignment produced a usable match.

Manual alignment asks users to place matching markers on two images without exact placement because the software smooths overlapping areas. Automatic hole filling wrongly covered screw and cooling holes, so the reviewer restored them manually. The process proved tedious but effective.

After hole filling, smoothing and simplification, the reviewer exported the model as STL and opened it in Tinkercad. The motor fit and hole positions matched the intended project.

A Michelangelo David bust used as the reviewer’s test file required three scans, a recurring requirement in the testing. Automatic alignment worked well, but several holes remained, including one above David’s left ear. The resulting model ranked among the best the reviewer had seen and printed very well; a flaw in the finished print came from bed adhesion rather than the scan.

The reviewer used Clyde, a stuffed Clydesdale, when no human subject was available. Black surfaces absorb light, so the mane and tail left large holes. An alligator named Ali produced a better result at the mode’s 30-fps rate. Two scans aligned automatically; the model needed only one large mouth hole repaired.

Repeated passes can create unusable data for meshing cleanup, while color mapping proved accurate apart from the repaired mouth. Blue-laser mode produced the strongest models in testing, but NIR remained vulnerable to dark surfaces.

What does the price comparison show?

The M1 Ultra’s $1,599 price sits between the $699 Creality Pika, which the review still calls excellent, and the $2,069 Sermoon S1, which offers more horsepower. The fully untethered Sermoon P1 costs $3,299.

ElegooScan makes calibration and raw-scan cleanup fairly intuitive, and its tools can turn stitched captures into usable models. The trade-off is time and computing power: the M1 Ultra generally required several scans where other tested scanners completed one pass. Buyers may also need CAD or other design tools to refine the output.

The review says this feature mix is uncommon among scanners at the same price. At the current price, the M1 Ultra must show that its multi-mode hardware and software justify the extra workflow against lower-cost and untethered rivals.

Source: Tom's Hardware

Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

Staff writer covering companies, deals and strategy in Semiconductors, chip manufacturing, hardware, AI compute at Chip Dispatch.

698 articles

Related articles

« Previous article